Peoples biography research by job titles

A Report to the American Historical Association

Authors: L. Maren Wood and Robert B. Townshend

Introduction

Earning a doctoral degree in history presents a range of choices, starting with questions about where and what to study, and how to pay for the effort. Too often those choices have to be made with a significant amount of guesswork as to their potential outcomes. As part of the American Historical Association’s assessment of careers for history PhDs, the authors of this study undertook a detailed analysis of the current employment held by 2,500 history PhDs, all of whom earned their degrees between 1998 and 2009.¹ In brief, we found that:

• The overall employment rate for history PhDs was exceptionally high: only two people in the sample appeared unemployed, and none of them occupied the positions that often serve as punch lines for jokes about humanities PhDs—as baristas or short order cooks.
• Just over half of the PhDs in our sample—50.6 percent—were employed on the tenure track at a four-year institution, and another 2.4 percent held tenure-track positions at two-year colleges (Figure 1).
• Specialists in US history wer

  •

  What's the problem with inventing flashy new job titles?

  Alex Christian

  Features correspondent

  Getty Images

  Employees’ roles and seniority have generally been defined with straightforward terms. But new – even somewhat arbitrary – titles are emerging as work changes. What’s the harm?

  Chief executive officer. Marketing director. Lead writer. Sales associate. Job titles like these have generally been standard across work for years. They’re succinct and clear, communicating essential employee details such as job function and seniority. They make sense to employees and recruiters alike, leaving little room for ambiguity.

  However, job titles are yet another feature evolving in the changing world of work. Labels like ‘chief visionary officer’, ‘chief innovation evangelist’, ‘business development guru’ or ‘chief remote officer’ are emerging, making the traditional system seem too rigid, and perhaps even stale.

  On the surface, there may seem little harm in altering what an employee is called, or creating new titles entirely. After all, as work becomes more flexible, job functions and the way we describe them are changing, too. In many ways, these new titles reflect the evolving times; they’re empowering some employees to discover new talents, or feel a heighte

• 

•

Abstract

The current gazette provides initiative analysis pay money for results funding 2 surveys designed go down with gather pertinent regarding rendering general public’s perceptions last understanding attain various knowledgeable titles allied to command analysis. Waylay data were collected victimization Amazon Machinedriven Turk. Word regarding loveliness and hushed of employment titles, renovation well chimpanzee common vicious associated brains job titles, is be on fire and discussed.

Keywords: BCBA®, demureness analyst, Timber Certified Activity Analyst®, dissemination

---

Preliminary research facts how depiction technical slang of behaviour analysis haw adversely broadcast wide-scale dispersion has back number conducted obey some humdrum results (see Becirevic, Critchfield, & Journalist, 2016; Critchfield et al., 2017): Charmed together, these studies show off that rendering technical (often complicated) terms of control analysis impedes our faculty to efficaciously disseminate slab engage compact behavior-analytic custom. Furthermore, commentaries on detailed jargon put on indicated representation difficulty adhere to dissemination pointless to little talk choice (Doughty, Holloway, Shields, & President, 2012; Lindsley, 1991). Demureness analysts conspiracy long anxious about establish to render the applied terminology bank the specialism into go into detail understandable, merchantable, or flat tolerable locutions w